Screener
LFEQ vs RAAX
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 0.11% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $905M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +39.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 13.66% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and RAAX
Explore further