Screener
NLR vs UX
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.25% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NLR is classified as equity, while UX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NLR follows a index tracking strategy; UX uses multi strategy.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | UX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $4M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.0% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.97% | 35.64% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -23.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and UX
Explore further