Screener
OMFL vs PID
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.24% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than PID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while PID is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL covers north america markets; PID covers global.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; PID uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $929M |
| Since | 2017 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -46.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and PID
Explore further