Screener
PBD vs PHO
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- PHO costs 0.16% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD covers global markets; PHO covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and PHO
Explore further