Screener
PHO vs PBW
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PHO costs 0.05% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PBW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $447M |
| Since | 2005 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +159.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 40.43% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and PBW
Explore further