Screener
PBW vs CCNR
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.25% less per year.
- PBW covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
- PBW follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $394M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and CCNR
Explore further