Screener
PCGG vs EPOL
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs iShares MSCI Poland ETF
Key differences
- EPOL costs 0.26% less per year.
- EPOL is significantly larger than PCGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCGG follows a active selection strategy; EPOL uses index tracking.
- EPOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCGG | EPOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $609M |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | europe |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.5% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +37.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.33% | 23.48% |
| Max drawdown | -22.66% | -61.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCGG and EPOL
Explore further