Screener
PFIG vs RWL
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
PFIG is a fixed income ETF, while RWL is an equity ETF. PFIG charges 0.22% a year and RWL 0.39%.
- PFIG is a fixed income fund, while RWL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- PFIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- RWL is much larger than PFIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2011 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -36.04% |
Similar to PFIG and RWL
Explore further