Screener
RWL vs VRIG
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than VRIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL is classified as equity, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RWL follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and VRIG
Explore further