Screener
PHO vs PBD
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PHO costs 0.16% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHO covers north america markets; PBD covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $208M |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and PBD
Explore further