Screener
RYLG vs XTR
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- XTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- RYLG follows a option income strategy; XTR uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, XTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLG | XTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $4M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 17.17% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.5% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.83% | 10.73% |
| Max drawdown | -22.37% | -20.83% |
Similar to RYLG and XTR
Explore further