Screener
REMX vs SMOG
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- REMX costs 0.11% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMX | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $152M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +165.8% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.82% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -73.34% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMX and SMOG
Explore further