Screener
RGLO vs ESPO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.06% less per year.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $257M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and ESPO
Explore further