Screener
ROBO vs ESPO
Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.40% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROBO follows a active selection strategy; ESPO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROBO | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $257M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.3% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -43.65% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROBO and ESPO
Explore further