Screener
RSPA vs CZA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.40% less per year.
- RSPA is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPA is classified as alternative, while CZA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPA follows a option income strategy; CZA uses index tracking.
- CZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPA | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $859M | $184M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 9.01% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.42% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -15.37% | -46.18% |
Similar to RSPA and CZA
Explore further