Screener
RSPU vs CGW
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Key differences
- RSPU costs 0.18% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPU | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $575M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.70% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -36.85% | -35.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPU and CGW
Explore further