Screener
RTH vs GPZ
VanEck Retail ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.05% less per year.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $245M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RTH and GPZ
Explore further