Screener
RTH vs LFEQ
VanEck Retail ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.23% less per year.
- RTH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RTH is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $29M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RTH and LFEQ
Explore further