Screener
RTH vs HAP
VanEck Retail ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.06% less per year.
- RTH covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $316M |
| Since | 2011 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -44.14% |
Similar to RTH and HAP
Explore further