Screener
RTH vs MOO
VanEck Retail ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.21% less per year.
- MOO is significantly larger than RTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | 13.87% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -39.52% |
Similar to RTH and MOO
Explore further