Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWK vs VRIG

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.2B

VRIG

Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$1.5B

Key differences

RWK is an equity ETF, while VRIG is a fixed income ETF. RWK charges 0.39% a year and VRIG 0.30%.

  • RWK is an equity fund, while VRIG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RWK follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
  • VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RWKVRIG
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$1.5B
Since20082016
Dividend yield1.14%4.80%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+27.3%+5.0%
CAGR 3Y+19.3%+6.0%
CAGR 5Y+10.5%+4.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.842.81
Volatility 1Y16.68%0.50%
Max drawdown-46.20%-13.04%

Similar to RWK and VRIG