Screener
VRIG vs RWL
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
VRIG is a fixed income ETF, while RWL is an equity ETF. VRIG charges 0.30% a year and RWL 0.39%.
- VRIG is a fixed income fund, while RWL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
- VRIG costs 0.09% less per year.
- RWL is much larger than VRIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $9.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.80% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.81 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -36.04% |
Similar to VRIG and RWL
Explore further