Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RWL vs GTOQ

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$9.1B

GTOQ

Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$165M

Key differences

RWL is an equity ETF, while GTOQ is an alternative ETF. RWL charges 0.39% a year and GTOQ 0.39%.

  • RWL is an equity fund, while GTOQ is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RWL follows a index tracking strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
  • RWL is much larger than GTOQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RWLGTOQ
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$9.1B$165M
Since20082020
Dividend yield1.24%6.80%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+27.5%+6.6%
CAGR 3Y+21.1%+9.2%
CAGR 5Y+13.1%+3.9%
Sharpe 3Y1.331.10
Volatility 1Y10.11%3.63%
Max drawdown-36.04%-15.96%

Similar to RWL and GTOQ