Screener
RYLG vs QTR
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- RYLG follows a option income strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLG | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $3M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 17.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.5% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.83% | 14.14% |
| Max drawdown | -22.37% | -31.72% |
Similar to RYLG and QTR
Explore further