Screener
SETM vs TINT
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.07% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +50.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 23.73% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -41.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and TINT
Explore further