Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SMOG vs PBW

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

SMOG

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$152M

PBW

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$447M

Key differences

  • SMOG covers global markets; PBW covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SMOGPBW
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$152M$447M
Since20072005
Dividend yield1.31%0.71%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+43.1%+150.5%
CAGR 3Y+11.7%+7.2%
CAGR 5Y+3.0%-8.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.450.29
Volatility 1Y20.30%40.29%
Max drawdown-51.11%-89.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SMOG and PBW