Screener
SOLR vs PBW
Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.15% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SOLR | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $447M |
| Since | 2020 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.0% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -39.44% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SOLR and PBW
Explore further