Screener
TAN vs OMFL
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.41% less per year.
- TAN is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TAN follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and OMFL
Explore further