Screener
TAN vs RPG
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.35% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and RPG
Explore further