Screener
URA vs URAN
Global X Uranium ETF vs Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- URAN costs 0.34% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than URAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | URAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $30M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.7% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +40.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 50.83% | 40.52% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -31.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and URAN
Explore further