Screener
URAN vs UX
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URAN costs 0.42% less per year.
- URAN is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URAN is classified as equity, while UX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- URAN follows a index tracking strategy; UX uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| URAN | UX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.52% | 35.64% |
| Max drawdown | -31.96% | -23.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URAN and UX
Explore further