Screener
XNAV vs FFLS
FundX Aggressive ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
Both XNAV and FFLS are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- XNAV costs 0.33% less per year.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $43M |
| Since | 2002 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | -4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 9.33% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.