Screener
ZFEB vs RPG
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.44% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than ZFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZFEB is classified as alternative, while RPG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ZFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; RPG uses index tracking.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZFEB | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.4% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.23% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -3.00% | -36.58% |
Similar to ZFEB and RPG
Explore further