Screener
EEMA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EEMA and FLAX are equity ETFs. EEMA charges 0.49% a year and FLAX 0.19%. The main difference: EEMA covers emerging markets; FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EEMA covers emerging markets; FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than FLAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $52M |
| Since | 2012 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.8% | +44.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.6% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.37% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -42.51% |
Similar to EEMA and FLAX
Explore further