Screener
VCLN vs PBW
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- VCLN costs 0.05% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; PBW uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $447M |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.7% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.00% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and PBW
Explore further